Testing the Gag Reflex of the American People
The American People do not want this. President Obama and his progressive=evil friends do. Who will get their way?
No, that “=” was not a typo. Progressives and their agenda are all about EVERYTHING the Founders of our once great nation were against. Against the American Experiment = Evil.
OK, so now that I have made THAT clear, I can continue.
Seventy percent of the American people want this debacle to Federalize one-sixth of our economy under the guise of health care reform to die. But the arrogant asses at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue know better than you do, so they are going to shove it down your throat.
Thus, my title.
I hope you have a strong Gag Reflex. If you do, you will puke it back up on them.
Now, let me be completely honest here, there are times when the will of the American people is dead wrong. Civil Rights is one area. Isolationism in the late 1930′s and early 1940′s is another. Those are times when true leadership was needed to make what had to be done the reality.
This is not one of those times.
Back in the 1930′s, one of the biggest arguments against Social Security was that it was little more than a vote buy. This has proven true.
This is more than an attempt at a long term vote buy. This is another step toward the removal of individual liberties.
But I have gone over all of this before and those who have a voice in this are deaf to the pleas of me and of those who are smart enough, or honest enough, to agree with me.
And that is just it. Honesty. There is a lack of honesty in this discussion and debate. Look back at the meeting held at Blair House last week. Democrat-Hypocrites continued their campaign accusing the Republicans of having NO plan. This is half true, because the Republicans do not have an albatross to dump on the American people like the Democrat-Hypocrites do. That is because the Republicans, and AGAIN for those of you who do NOT pay attention I am NOT a Republican, have a different approach. So, it is not a complete LIE when the Democrat-Hypocrites say the Republicans don’t have a plan, it is a half truth.
That is because the Republicans understand political physics. For every action, there COULD be an equal or opposite reaction. So their plan is to take things step-by-step and make changes as needed along the way.
Less painful, in theory. And that is why I prefer their methodology. This plays in to the concept of “leaving your self an out” to protect themselves, politically, if nothing else. But it seems more responsible. Especially, IF the real goal is toward reforming the health INSURANCE industry.
There it is. What is the real goal of the Democrat-Hypocrites?
Most of you do not know. Most people are too busy complaining about how rude or how bad the judges on American IDULL are this season. Or are wetting themselves over “Glee” starting back up soon. Or that Buzz Aldrin, if they know who he is, being on Dancing with the Has-Beens.
Progressives=Evil want you to be DEPENDENT on a LARGER and more powerful Federal Government.
I have posted on the plans on Saul Alinsky. I have tried to educate many on Cloward-Piven. And the will of the American people is against this bill would be proof to many that the efforts of me and others to inform the public is working.
But I don’t see it that way.
Why?
Because the Democrat-Hypocrites are moving forward. The reason why I have added Hypocrite to their party affiliation is because the move they are about to begin documents their hypocrisy.
President Obama, as a Senator, spoke against majority only votes in the United States Senate. He did so when he ran for the Senate. Vice President Joe Biden did the same thing. Harry Reid as well. In fact, Harry Reid denied that “reconciliation” would be used at that Blair House meeting last week, when he said just SIX DAYS earlier that it was something under consideration.
So, this is going to happen. Don’t accept it if you don’t like it, call your Senators and Congressman. YOU could stop it.
But let me go back to the meeting at Blair House. This was billed as an open discussion.
Bull Shit!
Look at the content of that meeting. Barry O spoke more than anyone else. Barry stammered and lied repeatedly while sucking up the time that could have been used to a true open discussion. Barry misrepresented the Congressional Budget Office conclusions to the plans. He was called out, by Senator Lamar Alexander (that Barry claimed was twisting things) and by Representative Paul Ryan.
The problem was further complicated by the pulling at heart strings that was offered up by the Democrat-Hypocrite members of Congress. The story of the woman using her dead sister’s dentures….I know I heard THAT one before. Here is a clue….medicaid or medicare would cover you for that. So, rather than talk about how IGNORANT your constituents are, HELP THEM!! THAT IS YOUR JOB!! And Tom Harkin, one of the biggest progressive-evil members of the U.S. Senate read a letter from a farmer…..yawn. Senator, help your constituents.
Alexander and Ryan, among others, masterfully used the words of Barry O and his ilk against them.
That meeting accomplished little. For those who are against the 2700 document becoming a law to enslave the American people view this as a good public relations move for their side. It exposed the Democrat-Hypocrites as wanting to use this occasion to spin the Republicans as uncooperative. It did that, but the American people still don’t want the Progressive=Evil agenda pushed on them. They saw that the Democrat-Hypocrites are going to forces this mess on the American people.
This is what “bi-partisanship” in Washington has become. And when you Republicans get ready to praise me for saying this, I am going to turn this back on you, too.
Ye reap what ye sow. Republicans tried the same strong-arm tactics when they were in power. And the Dems did it before them.
Bi-partisanship in Washington means that one side wants something so they will beat the other side until they surrender. This is a lot like an MMA cage match, but the results impact the audience.
I am disgusted. I have rambled on and I know it. But here is my point, and yes I have one.
We have a liar in the White House. We have a bad agenda being pushed by him and his evil minions in Congress. And Evil IS the word that I will use. Forcing the American people to be dependent is EVIL.
We have gotten the Congress and the President that we deserve. James Garfield warned us of this 130 years ago.
So, here is my final question. How many of you, who were outraged by ALLEGED lies of George W. Bush, and who voted for the Liar in the White House now, are going to give this CROOK a pass? And how many of you, who thought Richard Nixon was bad, are sitting back and accepting this LIAR to continue to serve and continue to LIE to the American people?
How long will you give him a free pass?
If you are and if you do, you prove my point that the term Democrat-Hypocrite is accurate.
If I offended you, good. That was my point. I want YOU to start with the man or woman in the mirror to make things right.
This dangerous liar needs to go. He is hurting our nation. Before it is too late, stop this bill and then stop this man’s agenda.
Meanwhile, the rest of need to puke on them….as our Gag Reflex is being challenged.
Leave a Reply

Mar 4th 2010 • 09:03
by Joe Reimers
Good thoughts, Jay, if strongly-worded. I do think this runs deeper than you write, though. Obama has invested so much political capital in this venture already that he needs something – anything, really – so he can hang his “Mission Accomplished” banner and salvage some shred of credibility. And his willingness to use procedural means to block the Republicans from having a say is a strong indicator that he’s willing to exercise the Nuclear Option for the looming fight over the impending SCOTUS vacancies (Stephens only hired one clerk, and Ginsburg is making lots of noise about retiring this year.)
Congressional Democrats are on their heels right now, and the loss of that precious 60th vote means Sotomayor will likely be the only SCOTUS appointment to go through without a ton of hoopla. During the Roberts and Alito confirmation hearings, the GOP were talked down from exercising the nuclear option. As things stand right now, I have no confidence the Democrats will exercise the same prudence.
Mar 4th 2010 • 10:03
by Administrator
Joe – Bingo! I actually remember talking with Bill Frist at the time that the Republicans were considering this same tactic. I got the impression that I would not want to play poker with Dr. Frist, because I think he was bluffing…but we’ll never know. I do think this was the right move then.
I have no cofidence in the Democrats and little in the Republicans. Let’s see how this plays out.
Thanks for posting here.
Mar 4th 2010 • 12:03
by Topher
Looking over the President’s proposal (http://www.whitehouse.gov/health-care-meeting/proposal), it’s not nearly as offensive as I thought. I am concerned about some of the mechanisms needed to implement this, but much of it seems to be a step in the right direction–especially with some of the Republican-suggested changes. I am concerned that there doesn’t seem to be any provision to allow insurers to set higher premiums for people with high-risk lifestyles (smokers, heavy drinkers, etc.), but I’m not sure insurers are prohibited from doing so. The only thing that really offends me is that the proposal would force all Americans who can afford health insurance to purchase it, but I don’t see that being different from states requiring auto insurance. I’d also like to see a “Most Favored Nation”-type provision, so that individuals would pay the same amounts for medical services that insurers pay, instead of insurers receiving heavy discounts.
I am a bit confused by your post though. What exactly is in the proposal that is so evil? Is it mostly the Medicaid for Working Families provision described here: http://www.whitehouse.gov/health-care-meeting/proposal/titleii/medicaid-working-families because many believe that the cost of implementation will be much higher than Obama represents?
Thanks!
Mar 4th 2010 • 13:03
by Administrator
The costs will lead to higher taxes, out of necessity. It is part of the Cloward-Piven model to eventually force a national salary to everyone. It is the pathway to enslavement.
What was the saying from one of the Star Wars movies about the end of liberty being created by thunderous applause? That is what this is.
Mar 5th 2010 • 10:03
by Joe Reimers
One other thing worth noting here: the comparison between mandatory auto insurance and mandatory health insurance is not really accurate. For starters, if you don’t drive, you don’t need auto insurance. It’s the cost associated with a privilege (admittedly, one which is necessary for many people.)
Secondly, the required auto insurance essentially covers harm to others caused by you. It does not address comprehensive care or coverage for costs you incur when the other person is uninsured/underinsured. Basically, in Indiana, the state requires you be able to pay up to $50,000 if you cause an accident while driving, but that has nothing to do with your own car.
Mandatory health insurance would be the equivalent of requiring people to purchase auto insurance with very high comprehensive and uninsured/underinsured levels, with riders that also provide coverage for oil changes, inspections, tire rotations, etc.